Succession Planning
The baby boomers are
retiring, leaving organizations with voids. From front-line employees to
technical experts, sales managers, and administrative executives, boomers are
employed at all levels of enterprises. Retirement gaps affect every area, from
business and industry to health care, education, and government. Organizations
must have a key employee replacement plan in place to deal with such
disruptions. In this light, succession planning is regarded as an appropriate
effort (Sambrook, 2005). Succession Planning, according to Rothwell (2001, p.
29), is a systematic process that is carried out in order to maintain and
enhance the organization's future intellectual capital, particularly in key
leadership roles. The succession planning process should be strategically
connected with the company's goal. Historically, the focus has been on
replacing key personnel precisely before they leave (Greengard,2001). It was
mostly viewed as a means of employment replacement. Henri Fayol (1841–1925), a
French management pioneer, was one of the first to understand and describe the
ubiquitous necessity for succession planning in organizations (Rothwell, 2001).
Attracting, extending, and keeping the greatest employees at all levels is now
part of succession planning. It must take into account the fact that younger
executives are more likely to switch workplaces and careers numerous times
during their careers. Organizations frequently make the error of replacing
personnel rather than growing them. According to Gulzar & Durrani (2014) at
every level of the company, succession planning entails having the correct
leadership in place. As a result, it also drives talent migration inside the
organization. Even while managing talent at all levels is critical to an
organization's success or failure as well as its long-term viability, having
great leadership is even more critical.
Furthermore, there are
other issues that arise as a result of the replacement process. In many
circumstances, for example, it is difficult to find the perfect individual for
a new position in a short amount of time. And if an organization cannot find
the suitable person within its walls, it must employ that person from outside,
which will increase the business's costs. In today's firms, developing
universal abilities, flexibility, and leadership potential at all
organizational levels is a sensible decision (Mamprin, 2002).
Source:
Rothwell (2001)
Because any firm must invest in training and development of a person so that he or she is properly equipped and qualified to take over any leadership role, succession planning is critical for an organization. A succession planning model was presented by Rothwell (2010) as cited in (Ahmad, Ming & Sapry 2020). Commit, analyze current work, appraise individual performance, assess future work, assess future individual potential, close the development gap, and evaluate the succession planning program were the seven steps established in the model for systematic succession planning and management. In his concept, he stated that promotion from within the company is critical because, in order for succession planning to be effective, the organization must be able to replace key job holders as openings in their positions arise.
Meharabani and Mohamed (2011) came up with the following as part of their research findings as factors that influence succession planning:
i.) Training:
Training plans assist employees in acquiring new skills and information, as
well as new talents. People who have been trained are more empowered, thus training
programs should be made available for successful succession planning. In
relation to my current job, employees are given training for the next
succession level. Its mandatory that each supervisor is fully prepared to act
at a managerial level when the need arises.
ii.) Management
Support: In order to develop an effective succession planning strategy,
managers must provide a great deal of assistance.
iii.)
Clarifying
the career path is another component in which a business defines the career
path in order to enable employees better grasp their professional ambitions and
implement succession planning more effective.
iv.)
Developing a good vision that will assist employees have a favorable attitude
toward succession planning programs, decreasing fear in employees who believe
succession planning will jeopardize their jobs. Effective succession planning
is influenced by a strong corporate culture that instills values, beliefs,
standards, and paradigms in all personnel. Employees can use these values, beliefs,
norms, and paradigms as a reference point for their daily work. As a result, if
these beliefs and criteria are in favor of succession planning system,
employees would follow them too.
v.)
Technological improvements have an impact on how workers are prepared for new
employment. Furthermore, technological advancements make it easier for
employees to seek employment elsewhere.
vi.) The organization's financial situation also has an impact on the implementation of successful succession planning. One of the most crucial prerequisites for training individuals is having appropriate finances for human resources.
“A
person who does not worry about the future will shortly have worries about the
present” (Ancient Chinese Proverb).
References
Ahmad, A.R., Ming, T.Z. and Sapry, H.R.M., 2020. Effective Strategy for Succession Planning in Higher Education Institutions. Journal of Education and e-Learning Research, 7(2), pp.203-208.
A. Mamprin, Next in Line: Five Steps for Successful Succession Planning, Washington, DC: The Center for Association Leadership, 2002.
Gulzar, S. and Durrani, A., 2014. Impact of succession planning on employee engagement in telecommunication sector in Rawalpindi, Pakistan. European Journal of Business and Management, 6(37), pp.274-281
Harrell, E., 2016. Succession planning: what the research says. Harvard Business Review, 94(12), pp.70-74.
Mehrabani, S.E. and Mohamad, N.A., 2011. Succession planning: A necessary process in today's organization. International Journal of e-Education, e-Business, e-Management and e-Learning, 1(5), p.371.
Rothwell WJ (2001).Effective Succession Planning. Ensuring Leadership Continuity and Building talent from Within. AMACOM, a division of American Management Association, 1601 Broadway, New York, NY 10019. Schall E (1997). Public Sector Succession: A Strategic Approach to Sustaining Innovation. Public Admin. Review,57(1): 1-10.
Rothwell, W. J. (2001). Effective Succession Planning: Ensuring Leadership Continuity And Building Talent From Within, 2nd, New York: AMACOM.
S. Greengard, “Why Succession Planning Can't Wait,” Workforce, vol. 80, no.12, pp. 34-36, 2001.
S. Sambrook, “Exploring Succession Planning in Small,
Growing Firms,” Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development,
vol.12, no.4, pp. 579-594, 2005.

Nice Post Ashanthi.Succession planning has, by contrast, a bias towards satisfying organisation
ReplyDeleterequirements. There is an assumption that failing to satisfy the majority of
requirements from internally developed personnel is unlikely to provide the
optimally effective organisation (Cannon and McGee 2011)
Hi Chulanga, thank you for the great insight. It is critical to understand the obstacles to designing and implementing an effective succession plan. Organizational culture, insufficient resources for development and implementation, inadequate rewards, and increased competition for talent and leadership from other sectors and organizations are just a few of the barriers (NAPA,1997).In highly complicated, multi-divisional, and transnational businesses, internal candidates are frequently considered the greatest choice for CEO succession ( Conger & Fulmer, 2003 )
DeleteHi Ashanthi, great post and Even though it costs time and money in planning , companies can be assured that the right candidate is selected for the job, which in turn leads to higher productivity and reduced employee turnover (Mascarenhas, 2011)
ReplyDeleteIndeed Namal. A good succession plan takes a lot of input and expertise. It has a comprehensive view of the business. Succession planning, on the other hand, assures leadership continuity and provides a firm basis for the board, employees, and managers when done appropriately and with foresight ( Richtermeyer, 2011 ).
DeleteHi Ashanthi, Interesting topic. Succession planning tells internal demands of an organization, internal promotion and search external talent to recruit, train and retain (Armstrong, 2009). Where a firm is concerned with new recruitments and lowering employee turnover, succession planning tells about action HR planning. In the event that a manager leaves the company or dies, succession planning forecasts and identifies means to elevate new managers (Armstrong, 2003)
ReplyDeleteHi Gimhani. Thank you for the interesting feedback. Further to the above points mentioned, deciding which route to take when utilizing internal or external for succession planning will depend mainly on the talent within the organization (Garg & Weele, 2012 ). However, both have its advantage and disadvantages.
DeleteHi Ashanthi, Interesting topic. Even though it costs time and money in planning , companies can be assured that the right candidate is selected for the job, which in turn leads to higher productivity and reduced employee turnover (Mascarenhas, 2011)
ReplyDelete